[tryton-debian] Bug#810007: python-profitbricks-client: Please use a maintained soap library instead of deprecated python-suds.

[Mathias Behrle]

* Scott Talbert: " Re: [tryton-debian] python-profitbricks-client: Please use a
  maintained soap library instead of deprecated python-suds." (Sun, 3 Jan 2016
  20:59:04 -0500 (EST)):

Hi Scott,

> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Scott Talbert wrote:
> 
> >> After looking again to the current state of suds-jurko (which is no more 
> >> fully
> >> API compatible), the result of the conversation at DebConf today between
> >> Benjamin and me is:
> >> 
> >> * Benjamin wants to try first to port profitbrick packages to pysimplesoap,
> >>  which now has hit testing.
> >> * After that he will decide, if he wants to take over maintenance of the
> >>  current suds package to do a drop-in with suds-jurko or create a separate
> >>  suds-jurko package or if at lest he doesn't need suds at all.
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Is there any new news on the above?  Benjamin, have you decided to continue 
> > maintenance of suds or are you going with pysimplesoap?
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Given the non-response to the above, would anyone object to me just taking 
> over maintenance of python-suds?

Indeed there are no news from Benjamin. As pointed out in [1] I don't agree,
that packaging suds-jurko as a drop-in for python-suds is a sustainable
solution. 
Nevertheless I won't get into the way, if you declare that you still
want to take over the maintenance of python-suds. 

Please tell, how you intend to maintain python-suds. Looking at your packages
[2] I see, that none seems to be maintained in a VCS, which would probably a
good thing to do, i.e. where would you like the current repos of suds to
be moved? Once the pending questions are clarified I will do a final release of
python-suds from my side to declare the change of the maintainer.

Best,
Mathias

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810007#12
{2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=swt%40techie.net

-- 

    Mathias Behrle
    PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/tryton-debian/attachments/20160106/b18a4ff9/attachment-0003.sig>