[Tts-project] Migration from Berkeley DB

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Igor B. Poretsky, le dim. 19 juil. 2026 08:12:14 +0300, a ecrit:
> >>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault <sthibault at debian.org> writes:
> 
>     Samuel> That is it. But that's a common thing to do. And notably on
>     Samuel> architectures which can natively run both 32b and 64b
>     Samuel> variants. Setting multi-arch tells people they can really
>     Samuel> run both versions concurrently.
> 
> Thus, the most simple and natural thing to do from my point of view is
> to drop out the Multi-Arch field particularly for the rulex-data
> package, leaving it untouched for all other binary packages built from
> the rulex source.

That should be fine enough, yes.

The non-native librulexdb2 variants won't work, but at least they will
be usable for cross-builds.

> But is it correct to have Multi-Arch field not for all binary packages
> built from one source?

Yes.

Samuel