thanks! and a tiny comment

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> [2007.10.23.2031 +0200]:
> > I am not sure it's possible. For one thing, after a merge, the two
> > parent commits are identical: they have been merged, not one has
> > been merged into the other.
> not sure... direction of merge does matter ;-) merging A into B doesn't
> imply that B gets any changes from A.

Yes, and I was wrong, judging how you can use M^ to refer to the
parent of the target branch, and M^2 to the merged branch, M^3 to
the second (in an octopus merge), and so on.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"it is impossible to foresee the consequences of being clever."
                                                -- cristopher strachey
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vcs-pkg-discuss/attachments/20071023/e83bd7ed/attachment.pgp