Separate branch for experimental)

[Kumar Appaiah]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:40:11PM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
> As Martin suggests you may just be able to get away with a merge.

This seems to be quite OK, and themos straightforward method. Thanks
for this.

> That will possibly leave you with a merge conflict.  In that case,
> git-mergetool, git-gui and gitk --merge are your friends.  Get it the
> way you want, and git-commit.  Update the debian/changelog as you see
> fit and commit again.

All this is just perfect. I still have just one issue. Can I share the
changelog across branches? I mean, can I separate the changelog alone
into a separate branch, and merge it into master and experimental (a
new branch) before the build?

Thanks.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036