Just a comment to your blog about VCS packaging in Fedora

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> [2008.02.21.1357 +0100]:
> Take a look at the bottom of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/VersionControl/ArchitectureDraft
> -- it has been last updated on 2006-07-23. That's ancient history
> in the fast flowing Fedora world. In the last year or so I have
> never ever heard anybody mention other DVCS than git. Aside from
> bzr coming from THEM :-), there is such overwhelming majority of
> git users over anybody else, that nothing else than git is just
> not an option for distributed VCS.

This has been linked from http://wiki.debian.org/VCSPackaging since
2005 or so and I even claim to have some credit as I took part in
some of the debates in the #fedora channel.

Anyway, we need to get more organised. I bought vcs-pkg.org, so my
plans are to slap ikiwiki on it and get it live sometime soon,
unless anyone has a better idea.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
windows v.i.s.t.a.: viruses, infections, spyware, trojans and adware
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vcs-pkg-discuss/attachments/20080221/e26d058b/attachment.pgp