rethinking patch management with GIT / topgit
Enrico Weigelt
weigelt at metux.de
Tue Mar 30 19:01:22 UTC 2010
* martin f krafft <madduck at debian.org> schrieb:
> also sprach Enrico Weigelt <weigelt at metux.de> [2010.03.24.1636 +0100]:
> > > But what if you need to change one of the already committed patches?
> >
> > Simply add a new commit ?
>
> To every maintenance branch, without the possibility to track the
> commit?
Why do you have so many different maintenance branches for the
same packages so you need some automatic tracking ?
Why do you not get along with an clear producer-consumer
hierachy ?
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the vcs-pkg-discuss
mailing list