[Android-tools-devel] RFS: android-platform-external-libselinux_6.0.0+r26-1

[殷啟聰]

Hi Hans,

Did you forget to push your changes after you upload libselinux and
libunwind to experimental? I'm preparing a 6.0.0+r26-2 and I don't want to
commit a manual merge only because of d/changelog.

I want to add back the version info to the libraries because dh_shlibdeps
will produce warnings about "can't extract name and version from library
name 'libselinux.so'". Seems like removing the versions doesn't fit
Debian's policy well.

I also think that perhaps we can upload them to unstable now because I have
been working on updating the others to android-6.0.0_r26. Since the only
problem blocking us is f2fs-tools's patch <bugs.debian.org/793863>, why
don't we walk forward faster? :)

Regards,
Kai-Chung Yan

Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> 於 2015年11月13日週五 18:41 寫道：

>
>
> 殷啟聰:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > Actually not any packages that depend on libunwind and libselinux are
> > uploaded so far, so I don't think it is necessary to upload to
> experimental.
>
> The point is that _all_ of the SDK packages in Debian need to be at the
> same
> version.  So we shouldn't put 6.0.0 packages into unstable until we know
> we'll
> shortly be uploading 6.0.0 versions of all the Android SDK packages. Since
> we
> have a lot of 5.1.1 packages that very close to ready, I think we should
> get
> those 5.1.1 packages all uploaded and working before including any newer
> packages.  That then means we'll have some larger chunk of the Android SDK
> working in Debian.  Plus some of those 5.1.1 packages have to go through
> the
> NEW queue.
>
> > About the removal of version info, well actually we don't know it. We
> don't
> > know whether we should put API Level 23 or Android version 6 or others as
> > the version in SONAME, so it'd better not to maintain it.
>
> If you want to actively remove that stuff, its ok by me.  But as long as
> the
> SONAME version is very low, e.g (1.0.0) then its very unlikely that
> upstream
> will use a lower version, so functionally, keeping that 1.0.0 version is
> the
> same as having no SONAME.  Therefore its very low risk to keep it in place.
> And it'll be no maintenance work unless we change it.
>
> .hc
>
> > Regards,
> > Kai-Chung Yan
> >
> > Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> 於 2015年11月13日週五 03:51 寫道：
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks for the update!  The changes look good.  I'm worried that we
> don't
> >> have
> >> all of 5.1.1 uploaded yet, and all the SDK packages need to have synced
> >> versions.  I'll upload the 6.0.0 packages to experimental for now, then
> >> once
> >> we have all of 6.0 updated, we can push them to unstable.
> >>
> >> About removing the lib SONAME version, its hard to say if that's the
> right
> >> way.  It is definitely the right way if we are not going to maintain
> that
> >> version. But I don't think having it is doing any harm, so I think its
> low
> >> priority work.  Getting all the build-tools and platform-tools for
> 5.1.1 is
> >> more important so we can have a complete set in Debian, IMHO.
> >>
> >> .hc
> >>
> >>
> >> 殷啟聰:
> >>> Hi Android Tools Team,
> >>>
> >>> I've updated SELinux for Android to android-6.0.0_r26. This is a rather
> >>> simple package so it will be easy to review.
> >>>
> >>> Note that in this version I removed the version info, here are the
> >> changes:
> >>>
> >>>   * android-libselinux only installs libselinux.so without version
> >> postfix
> >>>   * android-libselinux-dev won't install symlinks to libselinux.so
> >>>   * The SONAME in libselinux.so is "libselinux.so" withoud version
> >> postfix
> >>>
> >>> I am thinking of making such changes to other AOSP packages since AOSP
> >> does
> >>> not maintain the version info.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Kai-Chung Yan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Android-tools-devel mailing list
> >>> Android-tools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> >>>
> >>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/android-tools-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Android-tools-devel mailing list
> >> Android-tools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> >>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/android-tools-devel
> >
>
-- 

殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
一生只向真理與妻子低頭
Full-time student of National Taichung University of Education
LinkedIn: <https://linkedin.com/in/seamlik>
Blog: <http://seamlik.logdown.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/android-tools-devel/attachments/20151117/a5427be6/attachment.html>