[Android-tools-devel] google-android-installers_1652777492_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Roger Shimizu]

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 2:24 AM Fab Stz <fabstz-it at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 20 mai 2022, 18:48:35 CEST Roger Shimizu a écrit :
> > > I don't know how to fix it.
> > >
> > > Problem seems to be presence of "+nmu5" suffix.
> > >
> > > I used this scheme for version of binary package
> > > <version of component>+<version of source package>
> > >
> > > So I guess I would need to use an epoch, which is usually not encouraged.
> > > Do you have another suggestion?
> >
> > I'd rather not bump up epoch if possible.
> >
> > $ dpkg --compare-versions 11+r2+really+1652777492 gt 10+r02+nmu5 && echo
> > true true
> >
> > I guess we can simply add "+really+" in the version.
> > Just an idea, not necessarily to be this one.
> > You can try other string if you want to explore more.
>
> Ok for +really+, why not.
>
> Just another suggestion: what would you think about using a dot '.' which has
> precedence over '+'?
>
> But as per [1] . should be used in other cases?
> [1]: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#special-version-conventions
>
> "debian_revision components ending in . (period) followed by a number indicate
> this version of the non-native package was uploaded by someone other than the
> maintainer (an NMU or non-maintainer upload). This is used for a upload
> including a source package; for uploads of only binary packages without source
> changes, see the binary NMU convention below."
>
> So the version would become:
> 10+r2.1652777492
>
> dpkg --compare-versions 10+r2.1652777492 gt 10+r02+nmu5 && echo true
>
> May I let you decide which shall be used?

Yes.
If "." works, it surely better than "+really+"
You can decide it.

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1