[Aptitude-devel] Closing all remaining aptitude-gtk bugs?

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo (manuel.montezelo at gmail.com):

> > For finding them again later, some user-tags could be appropriate,
> > too, but only if someone tells it the potential resurrector.
> 
> Well, that's only my opinion.  I just find it awkward to close bug
> reports affecting different releases just based on the status on the
> most recent one (still in preparation, even if many people --including
> me-- use it directly), when the other releases are going to stay
> active still for a few years.  And specially in Debian, where stable
> releases are so fundamental and embedded in the culture.

IMHO? this is what version tagging is about.

If the bugs are closed with a version uploaded in unstable, they'll
still be visibnle to users looking at bugs affecting the version of
aptitude-gtk in stable.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/aptitude-devel/attachments/20120426/d4149e77/attachment.pgp>