[Aptitude-devel] Bug#782777: aptitude: marks certain packages as "new" and "not auto-installed" on every start of aptitude
Axel Beckert
abe at debian.org
Fri Apr 17 17:54:11 UTC 2015
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Since the last upgrade of apt (1.0.9.7 -> 1.0.9.8) the following happens
> > reproducably in aptitude every time it's started:
Actually that's seems a coincidence.
I've just downgraded all packages built from the apt source package
(except apt-doc :-) to 1.0.9.7 from testing and this behaviour persists:
> > The packages below are displayed as "new" (even if I forget all new packages
> > then) and as not auto-installed (even if I mark them again to be).
> >
> > Next start, and it's again like below (without and update in the meantime)
> >
> > --\ New Packages (13)
> > --\ debug - Debugging symbols (11)
> > --\ main - The main Debian archive (11)
> > i libasan1-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libatomic1-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libcilkrts5-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libgcc1-dbg 1:4.9.2-10 1:4.9.2-10
> > p libgfortran3-dbg <none> 4.9.2-10
> > i libgomp1-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libitm1-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i liblsan0-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libstdc++6-4.9-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libtsan0-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > i libubsan0-dbg 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > --\ libdevel - Development files for libraries (2)
> > --\ main - The main Debian archive (2)
> > i libgcc-4.9-dev 4.9.2-10 4.9.2-10
> > p libgfortran-4.9-dev <none> 4.9.2-10
It is interesting all these packages are built from the same source
package (gcc-4.9), but not all of the packages built from that source
package are affected -- especially gcc-4.9 itself is not affected.
But gcc-4.9/4.9.2-10 was uploaded already in December 2014. So that
upload is surely not the trigger.
But gcc-4.9/4.9.2-12 has been uploaded to experimental on the same day
as apt/1.0.9.8, so the observation that it happens since the
apt/1.0.9.8 upload is correct -- just not related.
But
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/g/gcc-4.9/experimental_changelog
doesn't show anything obvious related to packaging which could confuse
aptitude.
So no further idea what could have triggered this behaviour.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
More information about the Aptitude-devel
mailing list