[Aptitude-devel] Bug#642800: show old and new dependencies on upgrade conflict

Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montezelo at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 16:08:57 UTC 2015


>> BTW, I suppose that you tried to do the right thing by removing +moreinfo, but for aptitude I sometimes use/misuse/abuse tags to mean something slightly different, and set the packages apart from the big bunches.
>>
>
> I understand, but as a bug reporter, how am I supposed to know
> how the package maintainer uses "moreinfo" in his environment?

Sure, I know that you don't know that, that's why I was telling it
explicitly that if you remember, it's better to not remove the
+moreinfo in the case of aptitude -- otherwise your report might get
less noticed.  But no harm other than that.


> IMU, "moreinfo" is a tag to mark the bug reports that are somehow
> "assigned back" to the reporter. Maybe you should consider usertag
> to define your own set of bug report tags, extending the regular
> set? Just a suggestion, of course.

I thought about that, but I think that starting to user usertags would
mean some extra effort, even if not much, and I feel that I spend
already too many hours in the BTS :-/


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>



More information about the Aptitude-devel mailing list