[Babel-users] Invalid routes

[Don Weeks]

It may be something on the routerstation pro's that has nothing to do
with babel. I have this same scenario working on some Cavium blades at
the office with no issues at all. I will go ahead and take a look at
setting the Pro's up without mesh. I suspect it could be a driver
issue with the Athero's cards I have. Sorry for the trouble. BTW, the
Cavium boards are running MadWifi on a .21 kernel. While much older,
we know that ahdemo works on madwifi. I am using ath5k on my Pro's.
         Don

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Don Weeks <don.l.weeks.jr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> <Juliusz.Chroboczek at pps.jussieu.fr> wrote:
>>> However, it appears that some routes get established in the routing
>>> table which are not pingable. I think this may be due to some radios
>>> receiving but not transmitting.
>>
>> Babel tests for 2-way reachability, so this cannot happen.
>>
>>> However, pinging something appearing in the routing table results in
>>> no returns and also, I can not ping the IPV6 interface address over
>>> the link.
>>
>> You mean the link-local address?  The one in fe80:: ?  Using ``ping6 -I
>> whatever''?  If so, it's not a Babel issue.
>>
>>                                        Juliusz
>>
>>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> <Juliusz.Chroboczek at pps.jussieu.fr> wrote:
>>> However, it appears that some routes get established in the routing
>>> table which are not pingable. I think this may be due to some radios
>>> receiving but not transmitting.
>>
>> Babel tests for 2-way reachability, so this cannot happen.
>>
>
> Hmm, that is what I am seeing. I definitely can not get to those
> addresses shown in the routing table.
>
>>> However, pinging something appearing in the routing table results in
>>> no returns and also, I can not ping the IPV6 interface address over
>>> the link.
>>
>> You mean the link-local address?  The one in fe80:: ?  Using ``ping6 -I
>> whatever''?  If so, it's not a Babel issue.
>
> The link local address, yes. OK, I'll see if I can figure that out.
> The IPV6 addresses in the Routerstation seem a bit suspicious.
>
>      Don
>
>
> Sorry, I did not include the list.
>         Don
>