[Babel-users] the routing atomic update wet paint - because *I* care
boutier at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Tue Apr 7 10:19:43 UTC 2015
>> I agree, but I would like to know how many packets we lose. Since the
>> remove/insert happen in quick succession, I'd expect it to be very few.
> and the context switch and what little work it does alone - costs
> 80Mbits of forwarding,
What about putting multiple netlink messages in one datagram?
Will perhaps do that. :-)
Remark: error handling become more tricky -- but for just 2 messages it
should be fine.
More information about the Babel-users