[Babel-users] the routing atomic update wet paint - because *I* care

[Henning Rogge]

If you work with atomic route replacement even putting ALL of them
into a netlink message (or as many as you can fit in) works.

Henning

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Matthieu Boutier
<boutier at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>>> I agree, but I would like to know how many packets we lose.  Since the
>>> remove/insert happen in quick succession, I'd expect it to be very few.
> …
>> and the context switch and what little work it does alone - costs
>> 80Mbits of forwarding,
>
> What about putting multiple netlink messages in one datagram?
> Will perhaps do that. :-)
>
> Remark: error handling become more tricky -- but for just 2 messages it
> should be fine.
>
> Matthieu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babel-users mailing list
> Babel-users at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users