[Babel-users] the routing atomic update wet paint - because *I* care

Henning Rogge hrogge at gmail.com
Tue Apr 7 10:27:39 UTC 2015

If you work with atomic route replacement even putting ALL of them
into a netlink message (or as many as you can fit in) works.


On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Matthieu Boutier
<boutier at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>>> I agree, but I would like to know how many packets we lose.  Since the
>>> remove/insert happen in quick succession, I'd expect it to be very few.
>>> and the context switch and what little work it does alone - costs
>> 80Mbits of forwarding,
> What about putting multiple netlink messages in one datagram?
> Will perhaps do that. :-)
> Remark: error handling become more tricky -- but for just 2 messages it
> should be fine.
> Matthieu
> _______________________________________________
> Babel-users mailing list
> Babel-users at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

More information about the Babel-users mailing list