[Babel-users] Question about the status of RFC7298

[justin kilpatrick]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch at irif.fr> wrote:
> So while I encourage you to look at Denis' work, and while I'd love to see
> it forward-ported to head, please do not be overly disappointed if the
> final approach to securing Babel turns out to be something else.

I'm working on securing routing metrics from forgery rather than
actual encryption/security for the data in transit. I doubt what I
come up with will end up meeting anyone else's requirements nor be
upstreamable due to just how much I'll probably end up touching on.

So thanks for the warning but I'm off to make a fork anyways so I'm
not concerned.