[Babel-users] unicast branch test

[Dave Taht]

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:46 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> since, what the heck, I have 7 different versions of babel in the lab,
> I figured why not add in the unicast branch on two boxes and see what
> else breaks.
>
> An oddity, I think, is I see one box making a mh-request unicast, and
> the other box seems to respond with a mcast (?). Cap here:
>
> http://www.taht.net/~d/unicast.cap
>
> Is there fun, happy, new config options I can enable to enable way
> more unicast? :)

ah, ok, so the nlogn branch I've been running was derived from the
unicast branch?
which in turn was derived from the rfc-bis branch? and I've been
running that all along?

So all that's left is hmac? and dtls? yea!

I added default unicast true to one of those boxes, and yea! lots of unicast!
lots of ns solicit and response. Route transfers. over unicast.

yea!




>
> next up, is sending much smaller numbers of routes and veriyfing
> correctness... and getting it down to a few less versions. However, I
> now have enough lab boxes to basically do
> interop between a lot of versions, I figure adding 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.1 to
> the mix would be useful?
>
> and I *gotta* go climb a few trees.
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-831-205-9740



-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740