[Debian-astro-maintainers] astropy-healpix_0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Ole Streicher]

Hi Leo,

On 06.02.2018 20:57, Leo P. Singer wrote:
>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 03:05, Ole Streicher <olebole at debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> On 06.02.2018 01:07, Leo P. Singer wrote:
>>> I added a debian/copyright entry for astropy_healpix/tests/six.py:
>>>
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/astropy-healpix/commit/7250fe04bc3be27e95c5aaeb7225a341de71a7f3
>>>
>>> I think that most of the other copyright issues are in
>>> astropy_helpers, so probably affect most Astropy affiliated packages.
>>> What if we got the original source from GitHub tarballs rather than
>>> pypi so that we only had to pay "once" for maintaining the
>>> debian/copyright entries in the python-astropy-helpers packaging?
>>
>> As you like :-) I personally prefer Pypi as source since it is usually
>> closer to what upstream defines as the release, but YMMV.
>>
>> Looking into d/copyright of astropy-helpers, you should add another section:
>>
>> Files:
>> astropy_helpers/sphinx/themes/bootstrap-astropy/static/bootstrap-astropy.css
>> Copyright: Copyright 2011 Twitter, Inc
>> License: Apache-2
>> On Debian systems, the full text of The Apache Software License
>> version 2 can be found in the file `/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2'.
>>
>> Finally, the revision is still 0.2-1; don't create a new version yet,
>> since the first package was still not uploaded to Debian.
> 
> Hi Ole,
> 
> What about the three other bundled packages mentioned in the licenses/ directory, astropyscrappy, copy button, and numpydoc?

I updated that in the new astropy-helpers (3.0) package; you can
cut&paste from there. Note that I have split the sources in a Python-2
and a Python-3 version, and check the Python-3-version for that
("astropy-helpers", not "python-astropy-helpers" on salsa)

Cheers

Ole