[Debian-astro-maintainers] astropy-healpix_0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Leo P. Singer]

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 03:05, Ole Streicher <olebole at debian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Leo,
> 
> On 06.02.2018 01:07, Leo P. Singer wrote:
>> I added a debian/copyright entry for astropy_healpix/tests/six.py:
>> 
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/astropy-healpix/commit/7250fe04bc3be27e95c5aaeb7225a341de71a7f3
>> 
>> I think that most of the other copyright issues are in
>> astropy_helpers, so probably affect most Astropy affiliated packages.
>> What if we got the original source from GitHub tarballs rather than
>> pypi so that we only had to pay "once" for maintaining the
>> debian/copyright entries in the python-astropy-helpers packaging?
> 
> As you like :-) I personally prefer Pypi as source since it is usually
> closer to what upstream defines as the release, but YMMV.
> 
> Looking into d/copyright of astropy-helpers, you should add another section:
> 
> Files:
> astropy_helpers/sphinx/themes/bootstrap-astropy/static/bootstrap-astropy.css
> Copyright: Copyright 2011 Twitter, Inc
> License: Apache-2
> On Debian systems, the full text of The Apache Software License
> version 2 can be found in the file `/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2'.
> 
> Finally, the revision is still 0.2-1; don't create a new version yet,
> since the first package was still not uploaded to Debian.

Hi Ole,

What about the three other bundled packages mentioned in the licenses/ directory, astropyscrappy, copy button, and numpydoc?

Leo