[Debian-ha-maintainers] RHCS patches and lcros question

[Guido Günther]

Hi Ante,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:46:46PM +0200, Ante Karamatic wrote:
> I'm sending three patches for rhcs:
> 
> 0001-Install-lcrso-in-to-right-location-and-drop-build-de.patch
>    - really needed to make rhcs build
That's fine with me. I don't like the diversion from upstream either.
Martin?

> 0002-Upstream-removed-some-docs-so-we-should-try-installi.patch
Fine with me.

> 0003-Install-libfenced-library-with-libfence-packages.patch
>    - these patches can be used once git tree is updated to rhcs 3.0.1
>    - 0003... maybe looks dirty, but after the talk with upstream it
> sounds like a most reasonable solution for the time being
> 
> Now, about lcros. IIRC, I proposed that we move them from
> /usr/lib/lcros to /usr/lib/corosync/lcros. After a brief talk with
> rhcs upstream, conclusion was that /usr/lib/lcros is much better
> location. If we decide to change that location in corosync, we'll
> have to rebuild openais, pacemaker and redhat-cluster-suite. We
> should also consider adding stronger dependency on newer version of
> corosync; since this package exists only in debian experimental and
> development ubuntu tree, maybe we could skip that.
Adding a versioned dependency is fine with me. We should just make sure
we don't break Martin's pacemaker work so let's wait for a moment to
have him comment on this.
Cheers,
 -- Guido