[Debian-ha-maintainers] corosync/pacemaker in jessie - status?

[Richard B Winters]

On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 11:44 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer at cubewerk.de> writes:
> 
> Yes, we're working on creating fresh packages.  Richard packaged libqb
> 0.17.1, which should be usable but has minor issues, and the discussion
> unexpectedly died off (see the archives of the Debian-ha-maintainers
> list).

I'll get this uploaded this weekend with the changes we talked about
previously. It is simple, I was strapped for time up until now is all.

> We're stalled on creating shared repositories on Alioth and deciding
> their structure.  

@Feri, I do not mind at all using the deps-Ver#? variant you recommended
in previous conversations.  If everyone else is ok with it, I will
update the Git repository  on Alioth for libqb accordingly (forking
rather than tarball-import), along with the changes to the package
itself as previously mentioned.

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-ha is the git repo collection for
Debian-HA. I changed the repo type to Git for our Alioth page, and was
looking into updating the links in Alioth so they point to the proper
place - before I got rather busy. 

I'll be deleting the current libqb repository (which I made) and
replacing it so that we can start with an upstream fork - if that's the
route we go - in order to start the repo off right, and not with
redundant commits.

I also plan to update the Debian-HA site, but all this after we get a
working cluster stack.


> > I started to upload packages to mentors for pacemaker/corosync -
> > latest from ubuntu.

@Feri, looking at his version strings on mentors, and with what we've
previously discussed in mind; how should he proceed? I agree we should
standardize across all packages in the stack as you mention in previous
correspondences.


@Stefan, perhaps you could focus on Pacemaker, since Feri is already
working on Corosync, or even just communicate with Feri about work on
Corosync?

Some notes to ponder on:

- I'd like to ensure all libraries export a symbols file, if you need
help I can give you a hand.

- If you read through archives, Feri does some great review of my
submissions and it could be helpful to review those conversations
regarding hardening, docs, etc -> and making sure the pacemaker package
is also up-to-date with regards to such.



@Matthew, sorry for the delay; you'll see an update this weekend as I
mentioned above :)


Best,


-- 
Rik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-ha-maintainers/attachments/20150411/d162bd39/attachment.sig>