[Debian-ha-maintainers] backporting, packaging issues + Updates

[Ferenc Wagner]

Richard B Winters <rik at mmogp.com> writes:

> I think only the pacemaker binary package needs to depend on crmsh or
> pcs. But actually, you can use this stack without crmsh or pcs, so
> perhaps it shouldn't depend on either and we leave it up to the end user
> to choose their interface?

Yes, pacemaker should not depend on crmsh or pcs.

> [At least one of] the various library packages do require some of the
> components in the pacemaker binary package - I'm pretty sure; though I'd
> have to dig through and double check to be positive.

It that's really so, those components should probably be moved into the
library package, or split into a separate package.  Hard data would be
useful here.
-- 
Regards,
Feri.