[Debian-ha-maintainers] libqb priority

[Christoph Berg]

Libqb should be optional. Sorry for not having spotted that in the earlier uploads.

Am 17. Juni 2016 17:05:59 MESZ, schrieb wferi at niif.hu:
>Hi,
>
>Currently, libqb is of Priority: extra, while Corosync and Pacemaker
>are
>Priority: optional.  The individual choice isn't very clear, because
>neither package conflicts with anything else, but the Policy clearly
>forbids optional packages to depend on extra ones.  Is there any reason
>not to promote libqb to optional in the next upload?  Like 1.0? :)
>-- 
>Cheers,
>Feri
>
>_______________________________________________
>Debian-ha-maintainers mailing list
>Debian-ha-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-ha-maintainers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-ha-maintainers/attachments/20160617/08bc3529/attachment.html>