[Debian-ha-maintainers] libqb priority

[Ferenc Wágner]

Christoph Berg <cb at df7cb.de> writes:

> Am 17. Juni 2016 17:05:59 MESZ, schrieb wferi at niif.hu:
>
>> Currently, libqb is of Priority: extra, while Corosync and Pacemaker
>> are Priority: optional.  The individual choice isn't very clear,
>> because neither package conflicts with anything else, but the Policy
>> clearly forbids optional packages to depend on extra ones.  Is there
>> any reason not to promote libqb to optional in the next upload?  Like
>> 1.0? :)
>
> Libqb should be optional. Sorry for not having spotted that in the
> earlier uploads.

Great!  May I handle this with a 1.0~1 upload?  I'd also like to tie in
the upstream repository (via --upstream-vcs-tag) if you don't mind.
-- 
Feri