[Debian-l10n-devel] (forw) Lisa, if you don't like your job you don't strike. You just go in every day and do it really half-assed. That's the American way.

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Andreas Tille (tille at debian.org):
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:55:36PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 ddtp nogroup   13 Jun 15 14:48 timestamp
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 ddtp nogroup  836 Jun 15 14:48 timestamp.gpg
> > ddtp at churro:/org/ddtp.debian.net/www/debian$ cat timestamp
> > 201306150933
> > 
> > I just moved it (and everything else) out of the way and relaunched
> > the daily script that's run on churro to (supposedly) prepare files
> > wanted by dak...
> > 
> > Let's see how it goes..:-)
> 
> Hope this might help.
> 
> What do you think about my question whether I should revert my link from
> ddtp.debian.org to ddtp.debian.net?  As long as .org is switched of  all
> visitors or Blends pages will end up with 400.  I'd be in big favour of
> switching on ddtp.debian.org.  What can I do to let this happen?
> Talking DSA?  Or do you think I should revert to ddtp.debian.net?

Needs some common work between i18n folks and DSA. The DDTP needs some
important redesign to be able to run on a DSA-maintained machine. Martijn van
Oosterhout has done a significant work for this but had less time
later on....and also probably needs some more help

A sprint would help but I don't have the deep will to organize it. This
is probably what's missing: someone to take over such "leadership".




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-l10n-devel/attachments/20130825/fcad7d6d/attachment.sig>