[Debian-med-packaging] Licensing question about Insight Toolkit ( VXL / toms / ACM and non-commercial license conflict with BSD license).
andreas at an3as.eu
Fri Jan 29 20:08:39 UTC 2010
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> You bring up a good point,
> We probably should ask for advice to the
> packagers of these other libraries.
> What is the standard channel for contacting
> Debian packager maintainers ?
debian-devel at lists.debian.org
[Posting a link to the start of this thread might make sense.]
> > 1) the forensic of these packages could help to understand how to do the licencing work properly
> > 2) it should be feasible to use these shared libraries instead of static code.
> > I don't know if it is interesting or not. It's really an open question. (I have the same situation with another package)
> > What are the recommandation of the debian policy? What about the performance ?
I would by all means recommend to have library code shared between
different programs packaged as dynamic libraries.
Thanks for the effort to clean up the code base
More information about the Debian-med-packaging