[Debian-med-packaging] Product packages for Zope
Arnaud Fontaine
arnau at debian.org
Fri Oct 28 06:39:59 UTC 2011
Hi,
Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> writes:
>> > As already discussed on IRC some days ago, I suggest to patch (if
>> > required) and upload the Zope2 Product packages that we (the
>> > current Zope2 Debian maintainers) use, and request to remove the
>> > remaining ones from unstable.
>
> I assumed that the chances for any Zope 2 products inside Debian would
> be very low. Any summary of the discussion available?
Well, the summary is given above. Basically, it initially started with
the intent to fix these serious bugs[0]. On IRC, we just discussed what
products are currently used by Jonas and Gaël (e.g. developers who are
currently interested in having Zope2 available again in Debian and
actively using Zope2).
Also, some packages are almost never used outside of plone (namely
zope-ploneformgen, zope-scriptablefields, zope-atextensions and
zope-cmfbibliographyat as they require archetypes AFAIR).
I think that's all...
>> > all right, this leaves the zope-cmfbibliographyat and zope-zms,
>> > which should be removed from the archive if nobody cares.
>
> Thanks for the CC. Regarding zope-zms the situation is as follows: It
> always had a very low popcon value (which might be the case for
> several Zope products for sure). I was using it at some point in time
> but this was > 5 years ago. I currently do not use Zope any more and
> do not even have a Zope installation on my boxes - so testing would
> take me more time than I'm able to spend. I do not feel comfortable
> to simply build a lintian clean package which might work or not. So
> if somebody would volunteer to take over zope-cms this would be nice
> from a Debian Med perspective (because zms is targeting at medical
> care). I can confirm that I consider CMS as a high quality product
> which is actively maintained. If somebody would be willing to take
> over some packaging guidance and sponsoring for some upstream
> developer it might be feasible to keep it inside Debian.
Well, if it targets medical care, then it would perhaps be better if
someone from the Debian Med project would take care of that, isn't it?
(CC'ing debian-med mailing list in hoping that someone would be
interested in this package ;))
Regards,
--
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=pkg-zope-developers@lists.alioth.debian.org#_0_2_4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20111028/1f1dac41/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list