[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#687477: unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4

Julien Cristau jcristau at debian.org
Thu Sep 27 19:24:49 UTC 2012

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:26:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi Adam,
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > There seems to be some confusion here.  sitplus is _not_ in testing.  It
> > hasn't been in testing since June.
> Uhmmm, sorry for the confusion.  I never realised that it was removed.
> (I think I even somehow ignored one of your hints about this fact in the
> past because I was somehow sure that it was in ...)
> I can only tell for sure that sitplus was in testing at the point of
> creation of the Debian Med metapackages because it is recommended in
> med-rehabilitation.  This was in April and we did not recieved any RC
> bug against sitplus so I did not checked - perhaps it was just removed
> because of the missing Dependency.
It was removed because of #650059.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20120927/04ec6a6c/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list