[Debian-med-packaging] Fwd: GNU Health [1.8.0] (new version)

Andreas Tille andreas at an3as.eu
Fri Apr 5 12:07:36 UTC 2013


Hi Emilien,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:14:32PM +0200, Emilien Klein wrote:
> Hi Dmitry, Andreas and the rest of the team,
> 
> Any luck reviewing my latest changes?

I wonder whether you might have read my answer to your previous mail at

   http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2013-March/018886.html

In any case the remaining things are basically cosmetics and we are
targeting at experimental anyway I just uploaded.  Please make sure you
do some more polishing once we might target at unstable to simplify the
things you are describing in README.Debian.

Kind regards and thanks for working on this

      Andreas.

>     +Emilien
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emilien Klein <emilien+debian at klein.st>
> Date: 2013/3/6
> Subject: Re: GNU Health [1.8.0] (new version)
> To: debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> 
> Hi Dmitry, Andreas and the rest of the team,
> 
> 2013/2/19 Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob at member.fsf.org>:
> > Dear Emilien,
> >
> > Thank you for having a look at "gnuhealth" package.
> >
> > I've noticed that upstream released new version [1.8.0]: according to its
> > changelog it may be compatible with Tryton-2.6 that we have in "experimental".
> >
> > Also in November 2012 with your commit to "gnuhealth" repository you've
> > managed to overwrite some of my valid changes, notably:
> 
> I've reverted all the changes you've listed. Let me know if there are
> other things you disagree with!
> 
> I've updated the gnuhealth package in our team's svn repo to package
> the newest version (1.8). Using Tryton 2.6 (server and client)
> packaged in Debian experimental, I've been able to successfully set up
> a GNU Health database using the package produced by this source
> package.
> 
> A few points (more details in the debian/TODO.Debian file [0]):
> - Automate some of the manual steps
> - health_qrcodes is currently removed from binary package due to
> missing Python library
> - Mention Dmitry in the Files: debian/* section of debian/copyright,
> as he has worked on the package as well.
> - Improvement suggestion: package the demo database in a separate
> gnuhealth_demo package
> 
> Please review the package.
> Even with the list of things left to do, I believe the package is
> already good enough to be uploaded to Experimental. Let me know what
> you think (FYI I'm a DM, and thus not allowed to upload this new
> package myself)
> 
> Cheers!
>    +Emilien
> [0] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/gnuhealth/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian?view=markup
> 
> 
> --
>    +Emilien
> P.S.: Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to this list.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list