[Debian-med-packaging] r12915 - in trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian: . patches
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Tue Feb 5 20:56:01 UTC 2013
Hi Amul,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:43:21PM -0500, Amul Shah wrote:
> It's always fun to work on fun things.
:-)
> >On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 07:45:48PM +0000, Amul Shah wrote:
> >>Modified: trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/changelog
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-02-05 18:13:50 UTC (rev 12914)
> >>+++ trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-02-05 19:45:48 UTC (rev 12915)
> >>@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> >>+fis-gtm (6.0.001) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >>+
> >>+ [ Amul Shah ]
> >>+ * Change target release version V6.0.001
> >>+ * Update patches to match the new sources.
> >>+ Special thanks to Brad King for reissuing them
> >>+
> >>+ -- Amul Shah<amul.shah at fisglobal.com> Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:13:11 -0500
> >>+
> >> fis-gtm (5.5-000+git109-g57f2d89-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >>
> >> [ Luis Ibanez ]
> >It is OK to create another paragraph in debian/changelog. I just want
> >to make you aware that it is the usual case to have only one entry in a
> >package that is new to the Debian package pool. I'd recommend to keep
> >on maintaining the changelog for the moment but before the final upload
> >we might strip this down to "Inital upload" (as it is usual for new
> >Debian packages.)
>
> [amul:2] I noticed the V54002B reference so I thought I had to create a new version.
You need to start a new version if the former version was uploaded but
it remained "UNRELEASED". As I said: If the old changelog might have
any value for the moment it is no problem to leave it here. If it is
just for the history of packaging - we have all history in VCS.
> >>Modified: trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/compat
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/compat 2013-02-05 18:13:50 UTC (rev 12914)
> >>+++ trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/compat 2013-02-05 19:45:48 UTC (rev 12915)
> >>@@ -1 +1 @@
> >>-9
> >>+8
> >>
> >>Modified: trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/control
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/control 2013-02-05 18:13:50 UTC (rev 12914)
> >>+++ trunk/packages/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/control 2013-02-05 19:45:48 UTC (rev 12915)
> >>@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
> >> Source: fis-gtm
> >> Section: database
> >> Priority: extra
> >>-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
> >>+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0),
> >Could you please give some reasons why you decreased the debhelper
> >compatibility level? There might be good reasons to do this but it
> >would be reasonable to mention these arguments to prevent that other
> >team members start playing pingpong unintetionally with you.
>
> [amul:2] I used dh_make on my machine (Debian 6) and it defaulted to
> 8. I dropped the level hoping that would resolve my debuild
> problems. It didn't. I will revert it.
While it is OK to do the first test builds under stable you finally need
to build it in an unstable chroot which is very simply created by
pbuilder. It was one of the first tasks for Luis to create a pbuilder
environment. :-)
> >>-Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team<debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >>+Maintainer: Amul Shah<Amul.Shah at fisglobal.com>
> >>+ Debian Med Packaging Team<debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >> DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
> >> Uploaders: Andreas Tille<tille at debian.org>,
> >> Thorsten Alteholz<debian at alteholz.de>,
> >This change is wrong - please add your name to Uploaders and not to
> >Maintainer.
>
> [amul:2] Will fix after getting some help from Luis in a few hours.
Fine. I just wanted to let you know that you are not alone here in VCS
... :-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list