[Debian-med-packaging] r-bioc-gviz_1.6.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Thorsten,

nice to see that you seem to work as ftpmaster now - it is great to
learn that some more manpower is added.

On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 06:00:06PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> 
> The license text you added to debian/copyright is more like the license
> of Perl 5 (http://dev.perl.org/licenses/artistic.html), which is 
> Artistic-1. According to Gviz/DESCRIPTION the license of the package is 
> Artistic-2.0 which is http://opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-2.0.

Fixed.
 
> Maybe you can also make upstream aware of the advantage to include a copy 
> of the license text in their distributed package.

I will do so for the whole set of BioConductor packages once I need to
contact upstream again.

> Can you please also be a bit more verbose about the origin of:
>  ./Gviz/inst/doc/ucsc1.pdf
>  ./Gviz/inst/doc/ucsc2.pdf

These are screenshots which are included into the main documentation.
I added an extra paragraph to d/README.source.

The package is reuploaded.

Kind regards

       Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de