[Debian-med-packaging] r-cran-optparse_1.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

Thorsten Alteholz alteholz at debian.org
Sun Mar 23 17:30:30 UTC 2014


Hi Andreas,

so please add both the complete Python license stack and this statement
from Trevor:

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Trevor Davis wrote:
> Note that the "Python License" they have on their website
> (http://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=License:Python2.0.1) is the full 
> Python license stack which includes the historical modified CNRI and BEOPEN licenses
> and not merely the PSF License Agreement at the top.
> 13 years ago the FSF did make CNRI change the wording of an earlier Python license
> 
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PythonOld
> http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Python1.6b1
> 
> because it had an overly strong "governed in Virginia" clause but I'm using 
> the version of the CNRI which was weakened enough to satisify the FSF lawyers.

to the R/optparse.R entry in debian/copyright and reupload the package.

    Thorsten




More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list