[Debian-med-packaging] packaging for camitk 3.3.1 ready

[Emmanuel Promayon]

Hello Andreas,

> It seems not to work here (amd64):
>
> 6:   application-testcomponentsvtkimage3:
> 6:   /tmp/buildd/camitk-3.3.1/camitk-build/Testing/Temporary/application-testcomponentsvtkimage3/brain.mha
> 6:   does not match
> 6:   /tmp/buildd/camitk-3.3.1/camitk-build/share/camitk-3.3/testdata/ctestdata/brain.mha
> 6:
> 6:
> 2/2 Test #6: application-testcomponentsvtkimage3 ...***Failed    0.10 sec
>
> 50% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 2
>
> Label Time Summary:
> component-msh         =   0.82 sec
> component-vtkimage    =   0.10 sec
>
> Total Test time (real) =   1.07 sec
>
> The following tests FAILED:
>            6 - application-testcomponentsvtkimage3 (Failed)

I disabled test #6 as well (still working upstream on a better way to 
test everything). The other type of tests (testactions work).

>> More specifically I mainly followed the instructions on this web
>> page [1] (I just had to double the size of tmpfs in order to compile
>> the package, as it uses a lot of ITK-based template code which need
>> quite a lot of memory).
>
> I also needed to free some space but this was at build time and I do not
> think that it is influencing the failed test.

I agree, the test suite for the same distribution (sid in this case) 
should not differ!

>> Btw, the C10shell is great as it gets you a
>> shell if the build fails.
>
> Yup, I'm using this but I have no idea how to profit from this in this
> specific case since I have no good idea how to proceed from this failed
> test.

Agreed again. The main problem is in fact in the test design itself, 
which is being investigated upstream.

> Cowbuilder is somehow "the faster pbuilder" since it uses
>
>     _c_opy _o_n _w_rite
>
> I do not think that it makes any difference regardint the test.  I
> think I created my environment using simply
>
>     cowbuilder --create
>
> and I'm calling
>
>     /usr/bin/pdebuild --pbuilder cowbuilder
>
> to build a package.

I created a cowbuider (--architecture amd64 --distribution unstable) 
and... got the same error as you on test #6!
So test #6 is now disabled as well as mentioned above.
I have no idea why the pbuilder results are different from the cowbuilder.

Maybe the difference comes from the configuration defined in pbuilderrc 
files?

I also removed some old patches from the svn that are not needed anymore.
I hope that everything is ok now and that it can be uploaded.

Sorry for taking your time with these tests and pbuilder problems. I 
will use cowbuilder from now on. Hopefully next upstream version will 
include meaningful tests, all passing by default.

Best regards,
Mahnu
-- 
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20140502/6930f316/attachment.bin>