[Debian-med-packaging] libbpp-seq_2.2.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Alexander Wirt formorer at formorer.de
Tue May 17 14:03:43 UTC 2016


On Tue, 17 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:

> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:51:38PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > 
> > > Rename was because of gcc-5 transition, that didn't happen in jessie.
> > > 
> > > So the rename has to be reverted for backports, otherwise the library will conflict with
> > > the one in jessie, making half of the archive removed if you want to have it installed
> > > 
> > > look e.g. my mistake in llvm-toolchain-3.5 backport, where I didn't rename it
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2016/01/msg00113.html
> > > 
> > > (sorry for bothering, I'm not 100% sure about this particular case, I just want to point
> > > to a mistake I did in the past, I'm for sure not authoritative at all on the matter, so
> > > please don't trust my opinion :) )
> > Ah that may make sense. But if its the case, such things belong into the
> > changelog. 
> 
> OK, I missed this in this actual packages changelog.  Would it be OK to
> uploaded with this changelog:
> 
> libbpp-seq (2.2.0-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
>   * Revert v5 name change
> 
>  -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>  Tue, 17 May 2016 09:39:02 +0200
Yes. That way I wouldn't make the error to oversee the change between several
other packages I process. 

Alex




More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list