[Debian-med-packaging] camp_0.7.1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Flavien Bridault]

Hi Thorsten,

I have no idea why Corentin removed the upstream licence files by a
patch, it is sufficient I guess to not install them. I've just tried to
keep them at build and it doesn't prevent the package to built, I mean
there is no error reported by lintian for instance.

For the copyright, I'm not sure what bothers you exactly. For the
debian/* folder, maybe I should add myself as well ?

For the copyright of camp, at the time we forked the project, it was in
LGPL. I checked and then they switch to MIT in 2014. So maybe that's
what bothers you ? The copyright belonged to TECHNOGERMA when we fork
and now it belongs to tegesoft... So I'm not sure which one I should
use. I guess I should stick with TECHNOGERMA but you might then find
confusing that we report https://github.com/tegesoft/camp as the Source:
field in the copyright file.

Thanks for your work,

Le 28/11/2016 à 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
> 
> Hi Flavien,
> 
> please rework your debian/copyright. The information in it contradict itself.
> It is also rather strange to change upstreams license files by a patch.
> 
>   Thorsten
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 

-- 
*Flavien BRIDAULT*
Ingénieur de Recherche

fbridault at ircad.fr

*IRCAD France*
1, place de l'Hôpital - 67091 Strasbourg Cedex - FRANCE

http://www.ircad.fr/ <http://www.ircad.fr/>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20161128/73be9278/attachment.sig>