[Debian-med-packaging] pbtestdata_0.0.13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Andreas Tille tille at debian.org
Sat Sep 17 20:33:17 UTC 2016


Hi Thorsten,

I'm also very short before going offline for 2.5 weeks but in my last
mail before doing so I would like you honestly to consider accepting
this kind of packages since its definitely free and fit for Debian and
it IMHO might be worth a minor bug "please clarify BSD version" but a
rejection seems over-picky to me and is not motivating for people since
as you see it takes a lot of time for a package that is DFSG free.

Thanks a lot for considering

      Andreas.

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 01:24:59PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Hi, Thorsten,
> 
> على الجمعـة 16 أيلول 2016 ‫10:00، كتب Thorsten Alteholz:
> > 
> > Hi Afif,
> > 
> > can you please clarify with upstream that BSD from setup.py really means BSD3?
> > 
> 
> I'm 100% certain the license for this is the same as all the other
> software they develop (all dependencies of the smrtanalysis{,-dev}
> packages). Unfortunately, I have to catch a plane soon, so I can
> probably take this up with them (ask them to copy the license terms to
> this package) in about three weeks.
> 
> regards
> Afif
> 
> -- 
> Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
> http://afif.ghraoui.name
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list