[Debian-med-packaging] pbtestdata_0.0.13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Sat Sep 17 20:33:17 UTC 2016
Hi Thorsten,
I'm also very short before going offline for 2.5 weeks but in my last
mail before doing so I would like you honestly to consider accepting
this kind of packages since its definitely free and fit for Debian and
it IMHO might be worth a minor bug "please clarify BSD version" but a
rejection seems over-picky to me and is not motivating for people since
as you see it takes a lot of time for a package that is DFSG free.
Thanks a lot for considering
Andreas.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 01:24:59PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Hi, Thorsten,
>
> على الجمعـة 16 أيلول 2016 10:00، كتب Thorsten Alteholz:
> >
> > Hi Afif,
> >
> > can you please clarify with upstream that BSD from setup.py really means BSD3?
> >
>
> I'm 100% certain the license for this is the same as all the other
> software they develop (all dependencies of the smrtanalysis{,-dev}
> packages). Unfortunately, I have to catch a plane soon, so I can
> probably take this up with them (ask them to copy the license terms to
> this package) in about three weeks.
>
> regards
> Afif
>
> --
> Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
> http://afif.ghraoui.name
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
--
http://fam-tille.de
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list