[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#732858: We now have biomaj3. Do we need to keep biomaj inside Debian?

[Olivier Sallou]

On 12/18/2017 06:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:17:11AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> On 12/18/2017 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> may be we should fix this bug by removing biomaj since we now have
>>> biomaj3.  What do you think?
>> biomaj3 is the "replacement" of biomaj, but needs a migration to switch
>> from biomaj to biomaj3, this is not transparent for the user.
>> Don't know if it should be removed.
> But who if not you should know? ;-P
>
>> biomaj is however not maintained
>> anymore, so why not....
> Is this "why not" somehow yes-ish?

I would say yes!!
as older release isnot maintained anymore....
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas. 
>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA
Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu
F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438