[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#732858: We now have biomaj3. Do we need to keep biomaj inside Debian?

Mon Dec 18 17:47:37 UTC 2017

Hi Olivier,

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:17:11AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> On 12/18/2017 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > may be we should fix this bug by removing biomaj since we now have
> > biomaj3.  What do you think?
> biomaj3 is the "replacement" of biomaj, but needs a migration to switch
> from biomaj to biomaj3, this is not transparent for the user.
> Don't know if it should be removed.

But who if not you should know? ;-P

> biomaj is however not maintained
> anymore, so why not....

Is this "why not" somehow yes-ish?

Kind regards

       Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de