[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#909071: pbbam: FTBFS on every release architecture where it previously built (fwd)

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >    Bug#916576: pbdagcon: FTBFS pbdata/Types.h: No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > I need to make some noise in the team since I'm definitely overworked
> > > with these pb* packages.  It might be that we will loose these for
> > > Buster. :-(
> > 
> > the patches for pbbam and pbdagcon should sort out most of the issues.
> 
> I've now uploaded the old upstream version of pbdagcon.  Unfortunately
> I can not see that pbbam has fixed the build issues[1] - thus I think
> #909071 needs to be re-opened.
>...

pbbam does now build on arm64/mips64el/ppc64el,
this is what #909071 fixed.

pbbam fails its tests on 32bit (#829741) and big endian,
these are expected failures that won't block migration.

But the pbdagcon build failure points at a bug in pbbam:
libpbbam0.19.0 is not ABI compatible with the stretch libpbbam,
so mustn't provide it.

The following changes should fix the latter problem:
- remove the Provides: libpbbam from libpbbam0.19.0
- remove manual dependencies on libpbbam from the following
  source packages (correct dependencies on libpbbam0.19.0
  are now generated):
  - blasr
  - pbdagcon
  - pbseqlib
  - unanimity

> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.
> 
> 
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pbbam 

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed