[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#909071: pbbam: FTBFS on every release architecture where it previously built (fwd)

[Adrian Bunk]

And then there is the unrelated #908269 that currently prevents testing 
migration of pbbam.

Steve seems to be addressing this with
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/409374477/pbbam_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3_0.19.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff.gz

Adrian


On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:04:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >    Bug#916576: pbdagcon: FTBFS pbdata/Types.h: No such file or directory
> > > > 
> > > > I need to make some noise in the team since I'm definitely overworked
> > > > with these pb* packages.  It might be that we will loose these for
> > > > Buster. :-(
> > > 
> > > the patches for pbbam and pbdagcon should sort out most of the issues.
> > 
> > I've now uploaded the old upstream version of pbdagcon.  Unfortunately
> > I can not see that pbbam has fixed the build issues[1] - thus I think
> > #909071 needs to be re-opened.
> >...
> 
> pbbam does now build on arm64/mips64el/ppc64el,
> this is what #909071 fixed.
> 
> pbbam fails its tests on 32bit (#829741) and big endian,
> these are expected failures that won't block migration.
> 
> But the pbdagcon build failure points at a bug in pbbam:
> libpbbam0.19.0 is not ABI compatible with the stretch libpbbam,
> so mustn't provide it.
> 
> The following changes should fix the latter problem:
> - remove the Provides: libpbbam from libpbbam0.19.0
> - remove manual dependencies on libpbbam from the following
>   source packages (correct dependencies on libpbbam0.19.0
>   are now generated):
>   - blasr
>   - pbdagcon
>   - pbseqlib
>   - unanimity
> 
> > Kind regards
> > 
> >       Andreas.
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pbbam