[Debian-med-packaging] BALL licenses

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Ben,

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:47:26AM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that ball does not comply to the GNU license requirements.
> 
> I think this hat to be considered non-free.

your review is really welcome - but please be more specific.  The best
idea would be to do

    reportbug ball

and than name the very files and their license that are in conflict.

Thanks a lot for your contribution

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de