[Debian-med-packaging] maude new version and standard outdated

[Ben Tris]

Hello Andreas,

Glad to hear.
That reminds me. If it is helpfull I can notice about warnings like these
(Or what would be helpfull to notice about looking at the tracker?):

I noticed some packages that has this test warning: a new source-only
upload is needed to allow migration
like this: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/q2templates

These two together contain all high warnings for (shorten) debci
appstream build binary
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sofa-framework
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pbgenomicconsensus

Very rare: high standards and (low) translations:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qcumber

Sorted out high warnings: debci appstream build binary and test with
warnings.
Also sorted out last news from 2020, 2019, 2018-older.
Probably less interesting sorted out: new commits, version VCS newer,
VCS not up to date,  Failed analyze VCS
This is what I use for https://www.gezapig.nl/covid.html (more for
people comming from FSD)
Last news 2020: gone, new, recent (source) update, new upstream, old
upstream, autoremove

Nice Day,


On 16-04-20 23:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:43:14AM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
>> Oops, better http:
>> http://maude.cs.illinois.edu/w/index.php/The_Maude_System
> Uploaded.  Thanks for the hint - the previous version did not
> build - thus the long silence for this package.
>
> Kind regards
>
>       Andreas.
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20200417/480bfa06/attachment.sig>