[Debian-med-packaging] pll-modules_0.0+git20170809.d6cc565-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Thorsten Alteholz]

Hi Andreas,

On Wed, 22 Jul 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:00:09PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>> I wonder whether you are really the copyright holder of debian/missing-sources/*
>
> IMHO scientific data are not really copyrightable.

the data itself are facts and as such not copyrightable. But the 
compilation of the data might be protected by copyright. As I don't have 
any idea what these data are and how they have been created, I have 
to assume that they need to be mentioned in debian/copyright.
Please add a comment if you think that the assumption is wrong.

> I have a general question:  Wouldn't it be a good idea to keep the WNPP
> bug in CC in case of rejects?

I don't think so. The maintainer gets an email about the reject, the 
uploader and probably even the sponsor. So all people involved in that 
package are informed.
Of course, you can always send a patch for dak.

   Thorsten