[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#960756: Bug#960756: python-biopython FTBFS on 32bit: test_NCBI_BLAST_tools.BlastDB failures
olivier sallou
olivier.sallou at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 17:28:05 BST 2020
Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 16:47, Aaron M. Ucko <ucko at debian.org> a écrit :
> Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> >> My current impression is that makeblastdb is unable to work
> >> properly on most 32 bits machines, because the amount of memory
> >> needing to be addressed by the process looks like it might
> >> exceed too easily 32 bits architectural limits.
>
> That's entirely plausible; upstream tends to assume 64-bit systems
> nowadays. Explicitly supplying -blastdb_version 4 (the default prior to
> BLAST+ 2.10.x) may help.
>
options:
* simply remove 32bit package from Debian.... (though should work on
*small* datasets).
more and more systems are going to 64bit only, and we don't have the task
force to fix 32bits issues on such software (too much effort)
OR
* ignore issue as it is related to memory management but will work on
relatively *small* jobs, so software is ~OK 'till a certain point.
Olivier
>
> Thanks for calling this report to my attention!
>
> --
> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
> http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ |
> http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
>
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20200609/b4872497/attachment.html>
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list