[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#984093: libcifpp_1.0.1-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Nilesh Patra]

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:22:05 +0200 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier <emollier at emlwks999.eu> wrote:> > And wouldn't new version of libcifpp undergo a proper library transition? -- so is it not mandated for 1.0.1-4 to be accepted first?
> 
> At the time of writing, it seemed reasonable to me to transition
> from 1.0.1-3, which is still in sid and testing, to 2.0.N-M.
> But I might want to double check this at a more reasonable hour.
> In any case, the transition would involve another round trip to
> NEW, due to introduction of the new binary package libcifpp2
> with the SONAME bump.

Yes, but this should go a proper library transition, see this[1]
since SONAME is changing, I do not expect no-ABI breakeages, so this should go properly coordinated -- and this should go to NEW targetting experimental.

Meanwhile, we really need to get 1.0.1-4 in so as to avoid more delay.
If you agree with me, please do consider fixing the copyright, upload again to new, and ping Thorsten again to accept this.

[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

Thanks for your work,
Nilesh

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20211029/665fd146/attachment.sig>