[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1006384: closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Olivier Sallou <osallou at debian.org>) (Bug#1006384: fixed in logol 1.7.9+dfsg-2)

Paul Gevers elbrus at debian.org
Thu Mar 3 19:46:19 GMT 2022


Hi Lev,

On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogsleg at riseup.net wrote:
> swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
> require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
> Specifically, in this case logol requires version 67 of binary ABI
> (pre-compiled Prolog code), where the version of swi-prolog in unstable
> is at version 68. In case of logol, its fixed version needs to depend on
> swi-prolog-binary-68 (again, provided by swi-prolog-core). In this case
> it will be easier to track problems with ABI changes.
> 
> There are more ABI stuff in swi-prolog which can be tracked the same
> way.
> It is documented in d/Debian.NEWS and d/README.Debian and there are
> references to SWI-Prolog upstream reference guide. More specifically,
> swi-prolog provides 5 virtual packages, each of them containing (a part)
> of some specific ABI version claimed by the current swi-prolog version.
> All these components are extensively documented in SWI-Prolog upstream
> reference guide.
> 
> These virtual packages were introduced to prevent the same
> ABI-incompatibility problems with another Debian package, eye.

Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse 
build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with 
removing the block. But I'm afraid (without checking from my side) that 
the other package don't have the right virtual ABI package in their 
dependencies. If they do, wouldn't they need a rebuild too?

Also, if logol is already doing the right thing, shouldn't you as the 
uploader of swi-prolog request a binNMU for logol to enable your package 
to migrate at all? I mean, I would expect the migration to become 
blocked by uninstallability of logol in testing without a rebuild.

Paul


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20220303/f3529b36/attachment.sig>


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list