[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1006384: closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Olivier Sallou <osallou at debian.org>) (Bug#1006384: fixed in logol 1.7.9+dfsg-2)

[olivier sallou]

Le jeu. 3 mars 2022, 20:51, Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> a écrit :

> Hi Lev,
>
> On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogsleg at riseup.net wrote:
> > swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
> > require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
> > Specifically, in this case logol requires version 67 of binary ABI
> > (pre-compiled Prolog code), where the version of swi-prolog in unstable
> > is at version 68. In case of logol, its fixed version needs to depend on
> > swi-prolog-binary-68 (again, provided by swi-prolog-core). In this case
> > it will be easier to track problems with ABI changes.
> >
> > There are more ABI stuff in swi-prolog which can be tracked the same
> > way.
> > It is documented in d/Debian.NEWS and d/README.Debian and there are
> > references to SWI-Prolog upstream reference guide. More specifically,
> > swi-prolog provides 5 virtual packages, each of them containing (a part)
> > of some specific ABI version claimed by the current swi-prolog version.
> > All these components are extensively documented in SWI-Prolog upstream
> > reference guide.
> >
> > These virtual packages were introduced to prevent the same
> > ABI-incompatibility problems with another Debian package, eye.
>
> Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
> build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
> removing the block. But I'm afraid (without checking from my side) that
> the other package don't have the right virtual ABI package in their
> dependencies. If they do, wouldn't they need a rebuild too?
>
> Also, if logol is already doing the right thing, shouldn't you as the
> uploader of swi-prolog request a binNMU for logol to enable your package
> to migrate at all? I mean, I would expect the migration to become
> blocked by uninstallability of logol in testing without a rebuild.
>

Hi, i have rebuilt and pushed logol in sid recompiled with the new abi.
However, with lev info, i should add for later updates the
swi-prolog-binary-68 dependency.

Swi prolog needs to move to testing before updated logol.

Olivier


> Paul
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20220303/cab2a1b5/attachment.htm>