[Debian-med-packaging] libzeep

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Maarten,

Am Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 10:50:10AM +0100 schrieb Maarten L. Hekkelman:
> Op 24-02-2026 om 10:46 schreef Santiago Vila:
> > The recent libzeep upload does not pass the autopkgtests:
> > 
> > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libzeep
> > 
> > so you might want to look at that.
> > 
> > [ I was looking at this package because I'm fixing bugs of
> >    type "ftbfs source after build". Since this package will
> >    need another upload, I've fixed the bug in salsa only ].
> 
> I was a bit surprised to see libzeep being uploaded. I prepared a new
> package in salsa but that depended on libzeem which was in NEW.

Sorry for that uncoordinated upload.  I was in "sprint-fever" and
hunting all libboost 1.90 related bugs.  Since the version in unstable
was affected while the new version is not I've thought it would be a
good idea to upgrade (given that we are in an early phase of the next
release.
 
> When libzeem was accepted Andreas Tille was very quick in uploading libzeep.
> But I guess this should have officially gone through NEW as well since there
> is an SONAME change.

Sure.  that was the case.  New processing is just super fast for
existing packages with binary change thanks to the new DFSG team.

> On the other hand, as far as I know no other packages depend on libzeep at
> this moment in Debian. Which is a big shame of course. :-)

Can you please more precise about this?  What packages could profit
from your point of view?
 
> Anyway, I'll have a look at this.

Thank you and sorry again for the uncoordinated team upload.

Kind regards
    Andreas. 

-- 
https://fam-tille.de