ongoing slepc/petsc transition

[Adam C Powell IV]

On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> 
> > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
> > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready.
> > 
> mumps and hdf5 have now transitioned.  For petsc/slepc, they either need
> to build again on armel and kfreebsd-*, or the out of date binaries on
> those architectures need to be removed, by filing a bug against the
> ftp.debian.org pseudo-package.

The bug against ftp.debian.org has been filed and closed (661936), but
petsc and slepc and their reverse-depends have not transitioned.

What more needs to happen?  I see a transition page for slepc at
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/slepc.html , does feel++ need
to build for any of these other packages to go in?

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120305/99aebf78/attachment.pgp>