ongoing slepc/petsc transition

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Mar  5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > 
> > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
> > > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready.
> > > 
> > mumps and hdf5 have now transitioned.  For petsc/slepc, they either need
> > to build again on armel and kfreebsd-*, or the out of date binaries on
> > those architectures need to be removed, by filing a bug against the
> > ftp.debian.org pseudo-package.
> 
> The bug against ftp.debian.org has been filed and closed (661936), but
> petsc and slepc and their reverse-depends have not transitioned.
> 
> What more needs to happen?  I see a transition page for slepc at
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/slepc.html , does feel++ need
> to build for any of these other packages to go in?
> 
The bug you reference seems to be about petsc.  slepc has the same
issue.

Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120305/468b7610/attachment.pgp>