ongoing slepc/petsc transition

[Adam C Powell IV]

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar  5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
> > > > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready.
> > > > 
> > > mumps and hdf5 have now transitioned.  For petsc/slepc, they either need
> > > to build again on armel and kfreebsd-*, or the out of date binaries on
> > > those architectures need to be removed, by filing a bug against the
> > > ftp.debian.org pseudo-package.
> > 
> > The bug against ftp.debian.org has been filed and closed (661936), but
> > petsc and slepc and their reverse-depends have not transitioned.
> > 
> > What more needs to happen?  I see a transition page for slepc at
> > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/slepc.html , does feel++ need
> > to build for any of these other packages to go in?
> > 
> The bug you reference seems to be about petsc.  slepc has the same
> issue.

Oh dear.  Do we need to do this for every reverse-depends package in
order for the whole thing to transition?

PETSc is the one with the build trouble on these architectures...

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120305/29a18732/attachment.pgp>